My Comments (not previously published) on:

Gil Troy

Michael Jackson: The King of Pop Made His Mark,

HNN,
June 25, 2009

 original (demised) URL
http://hnn.us/blogs/comments/94788.html
No longer available through History News Metwork

Article reposted [sans HNN comments] on a music-oriented site,
 Bootlegbetty (I.e. Bette Midler)

https://bootlegbetty.com/2009/06/26/the-man-in-the-mirror/

Also

https://web.archive.org/web/20090827054220/http://hnn.us/blogs/comments/94788.html#comment

Likewise no comments.

Andrew D. Todd

 a_d_todd@rowboats-sd-ca.com 

http://rowboats-sd-ca.com/



(My Responses, not previously published)
06/27/2009 05:59 PM

Michael Jackson And The Criminal Underclass. Such A Little Man!

I'm about fifty  myself, and I have never regarded Michael Jackson as any kind of affirmative symbolic figure. As near as I can remember about  what  I thought back at  the  age of twenty, my impression was that Michael  Jackson was a black man with an overwhelming desire to be white-- and, as a honkey, I dismissed him as irrelevant.  One respects those who respect themselves. His hair was "processed," and he seemed to have bleached  his skin. As Joseph Wambaugh pointed out, in _The New Centurions_, those were the conventional stylistic accouterments of a street pimp. At any rate, I had no desire to know more of him. By contrast, in urban politics, a group of men were coming to power, whom one might call "Martin Luther King's lieutenants," men like Jesse Jackson. They didn't  look anything like Michael Jackson. Further down, there were tens of thousands of black cops and school principals. The  one entertainment figure who really did prefigure Obama was Sidney Portier (_In the  Heat of the Night_, _Guess Who's Coming to Dinner_). I think it would be fair to say that Portier defined the sense of what a black authority figure was supposed look like and how he was supposed to  talk, etc. Cleavon Little's performance  in _Blazing Saddles_ is a kind of satiric comment on Portier, resentfully envious, and in disbelief that anyone could really have that much "command presence."

 [Below] is a piece I wrote a year ago, over on Techdirt. I was attempting to develop a historical context, HNN style, for the ongoing debate about copyright and music piracy.


It provides a useful framework for understanding Michael Jackson. "Pop" music, and other forms of commercial "youth culture" were fundamentally  premised  around  colossal alienation of children from parents. The circumstance that Michael  Jackson wound up  boffing  little  boys, and eventually overdosed on drugs, was a logical summation of his entire career. It was an expression of what the  whole  pop music industry is all about. The intellectual adulation of the commercial pop music culture is ultimately a form of "stepinfetchitism."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson

(demised) http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/Michael-Jackson-lyrics/B3E7B27FC2EE0AC44825699D0029FE4C

To my way of thinking, "the most famous person of our generation-- until Obama" would surely be either Bill Gates or Steve Jobs. Both them have tragic flaws worthy of Greek or Elizabethan drama, and, in the end, it was  necessary that  "Birnam Wood should come to Dunsanie." But if you stand Michael Jackson up against those two, even as a young man, he wasn't  much. He might _possibly_ be adequate as the drunken  porter in  _Macbeth_.





The Cult of the Rich Recording Artist


https://www.techdirt.com/2008/01/23/a-little-history-lesson-on-how-the-recording-industry-works/#comment-719403

       formerly http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080122/18320341.shtml

My comment on:

Mike Masnick,A Little History Lesson On How The Recording Industry Works, Techdirt, Wed, Jan 23rd 2008

https://www.techdirt.com/2008/01/23/a-little-history-lesson-on-how-the-recording-industry-works/

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/omm/story/0,,2241544,00.html



The technical barriers to entry in the music business are not really all that compelling. They are no greater than the  barriers which writers have long been overcoming. Nowadays, with computers, typing is ubiquitous, but it did not use to be.  In L. Sprague De Camp's handbook for science fiction writers, written in 1975, back in the typewriter era, there is the advice that a professional writer must learn to type. There is even a very active tradition, going back a couple of hundred years, of the author as printer (Benjamin Franklin, Virginia Woolf and the Hogarth Press, etc.), and the personal website is only the most recent incarnation. There was a certain type of writer who not  only printed his own work, but went out on the street and sold books or pamphlets from a satchel slung over his shoulder (*). The same kind of reasoning applied to music would be that a serious musician must develop the skills to be his own sound engineer. If recording equipment is too expensive, then he must learn enough electrical engineering to build his own equipment. What it comes down to is that the artist is at too much of a disadvantage if he has to rely on someone else to finish his work. Middle class artists routinely learn whatever skills they need and buy whatever equipment they need. There is the well-known "artists and lofts" phenomena. A good artist, that is, a painter or a sculptor, has all the essential aptitudes to be a good carpenter. Therefore, struggling artists rebuild buildings to work in, so as to save on rent, and then sell the buildings (or long leases).  Thus they make a living by carpentry if they cannot do so by art per se. By 1975, audio cassette tapes were coming into  use, and they were soon followed by videocassette tapes. For a period of time, tapes were the preferred medium for distribution, and for both kinds of tapes, a typical player was also a recorder.  Read-only CD's did not  last very long before being superseded by laser-written CD's. The same thing happened with DVD's. The "read-only window" was only about five years in duration, less than the lag between different kinds of equipment which were still in use at any given time. The real issue, of course, is simply the social class basis of popular music. Being middle class is about being in control of your own life. Being subproletariet is about being "done unto."

The movie/music industry has about  as involved Mafia connections as any industry except garbage hauling. Popular  entertainment traditionally has a kind of blurred  boundary with  prostitution, which is of course a long-recognized organized crime business. "Showgirl" or "French Actress" was traditionally a euphemism for a prostitute. The ancestral form of modern popular entertainment in the nineteenth century was the music hall. The music hall was itself an innovation, superseding the traditional streetcorner performer. Every town had a music hall, and big cities had multiple music halls. The music halls employed large  numbers of performers, but, in order to keep the costs down, the music halls didn't pay the performers very much, not really enough to eat regularly. The performers were expected to make up the difference with a bit of prostitution, or some other "grift." Performing on the  popular stage, as a singer, actress, or dancer, was an unremunerative occupation which prostitutes did by way of advertising. This comes across in  the short stories the great French writer Colette wrote from her own personal experiences backstage, circa 1900. In one episode, a desperately hungry little ballerina does a B-girl  routine in  order to trick a strange man into buying her a ham sandwich, and escapes before he can claim his quid pro quo. 
 
 Jazz music is the  great ancestor of nearly all modern pop music. However, jazz comes from New  Orleans. Until 1917, New Orleans had a legal brothel district, Storeyville, located where the Iberville Projects were later  built. The legal brothels were all  fitted out as nightclubs, with all the usual trimmings such as restaurants and live orchestras.  All the great jazzmen were employed by such places, and naturally did  various kind of related work, which made them  pimps. The curious thing about "pop" music is that it is an essentially plebeian art form, appealing to the emotions rather than the intellect. The pop musician sings his pain, in crude personal terms. You cannot perform jailhouse rock with full credibility unless you have been in jail, and most people in jail are there because they cannot afford bail.

In the United States, mechanically reproduced entertainment, that is phonograph records, radio, and motion pictures, took off  at the  same time as Prohibition (1920-33), the  period during which the sale of alcoholic beverages was banned,  and alcohol was treated as an illegal drug. This meant that a drinking establishment was axiomatically a criminal business.  Entertainers below the star level, who could not expect people to make a special trip to hear them, were perforce mob employees. That meant that the music, movie, and radio businesses had to give the mob a piece of the action in order to gain access to the performers the mob owned. Existing music halls tended to be converted  to moviehouses, and there, too, the pre-existing stakeholders had to  be  paid off.

The entertainment industry became mob-controlled, because it grew out of prostitution, which was itself mob-controlled. The mob was an effect rather than a cause. It grew up to control a cluster of "reprobated practices." These reprobated practices naturally used the underclasses, simply according to the logic of slavery. Symphony orchestras were never mob-controlled, because that kind of music was not reprobated. Businessmen would pay to have their daughters taught to play the piano or the violin by someone who was a member of the  symphony. At a higher level, the best musicians tended to become official composers, with what amounted to civil service posts. In our secularized age, that works out to teaching in the music school of a state university.

Pop music is a music of social disintegration.  To understand modern pop music, one must also understand the assembly line mass-production factory, and the Faustian bargain it made with the worker. The mass-production factory was an artifact of transition. In any given locality, barring massive immigration, it only lasted for a single generation, before moving on somewhere else in search of cheaper labor. Factory work was so brutally hard that it was unattractive to anyone who had a skilled occupation or the education for a middle-class job. Factories recruited peasants, because hand-cultivation was about the only work worse than working on an assembly line. The son of a peasant  came and worked on an assembly line, and made good  wages,  good enough to buy a house and send his children to school, so that they could  be something other than factory workers or peasants. Everything has a price, however. The price of wealth was cultural discontinuity. From the perspective of the children, their grandfather was an ignorant and wretched peasant. There  might even be a language disconnect, with the grandfather speaking only the language of  the  old country, and the children speaking only English. The children's father, on the other hand, spent his days doing something incredibly boring in a factory, which he did not want to talk about, and which left him in a state of chronic fatigue, prone to sudden and irrational anger. This left the children deprived of a sense  of identity. They were cultural orphans, ready to be recruited by someone like Elvis Presley. The mass worship of someone like Presley or Britney Spears  has a certain sinister family likeness to the mass worship of someone like Adolph Hitler or Josef Stalin. The child is taught to adulate someone who does not even know that he exists, and who  has no concern for his welfare. This can only happen when parent-child relations have gone catastrophically wrong. 

 To take one example, I had never heard of Britney Spears until she called herself to my attention by becoming a noisy RIAA spokesperson. Then, of course, it was necessary to research her a bit. Examining a few of her lyrics, I noted that these are the voice of a beggar girl, on the street and dealing with her boyfriend-pimp in terms of crude power, trying to avoid being reduced to the condition of a prostitute with her customer. There is a persistently materialistic strain running through the songs, preoccupied with the getting of consumer goods. Stars are not stars because of some unique talent, but because they can represent themselves as a simulacrum of the audience, while simultaneously emphasizing how rich they are. The idea  is that the audience can then imagine themselves being rich.. Someone like Britney Spears has to act out in public at regular intervals in order to maintain her slum-girl standing, hence the  drugs, drunk driving, and whatnot. Britney Spears' songs are not the voice of a middle class girl, with mummy and daddy protectively visible in the background. The condition of middle-class childhood is to be given everything which it is right for one to have. Pop music singers are, in other contexts, the natural prey of the slumlord. The record companies are able to sign them to iniquitous contracts because they do not have family lawyers to take advice from.   One additional aspect of underclass culture is that organized crime is ubiquitous. Businesses which deal with the underclass on a regular basis are apt to get roped in, on a quid pro quo basis. I found it exquisitely significant that one of the first victims of the RIAA lawsuits turned out to be a twelve-year-old girl who lived in a housing project. No one else would buy into Britney Spears' debased values. Books, on the other hand, are an essentially intellectual medium, essentially middle class, and book authors concede very little to publishers.

One important implication  for the recording industry is this: the assembly  line wave has passed through the United States, and exited again, bound for China. The special conditions which caused young people  who were not slum dwellers to identify with slum dwellers, and even with pimps and prostitutes,  will  fade. Relations between parents and children will become much more healthy and vital, because they are no  longer arguing across a class barrier, and this will tend to exclude the RIAA. Children are naturally interested in whatever it is that their parents do, or whatever their parents like. Commercial youth culture can only succeed by default.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(*) Interesting sidenote, the  French term for eighteenth-century contraband writings, "colportage," or "peddling" as the dictionary would have it, translates literally as "carrying on the neck. One envisions a shifty character, with his satchel crosswise over his shoulder, sidling through a market crowd, selling dirty and/or politically subversive books, while keeping an  eye out for the  police.

Ed Reid and Ovid Demaris, The Green Felt Jungle, 1963
    An interesting book about the boundary between the entertainment  industry and the mob in  Las Vegas.

Robert Phelps, ed., The Collected Stories of Colette, 1984, Part  II, "Backstage at the Music Hall"








  Index   Home